On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:49:44 -0500, "paul jones" <pdj### [at] psuedu> wrote:

>Very nice image, I really am impressed at the vibrancy of the texturing and
>the labels.

The labels are logos ripped off the web or brochures. I can not take
any credit for those.

>It looks like the scene is set in an actual room, is this true? I get the
>impression there is wood paneling for walls (from the reflections in the
>orange ball).

No, there's just the ground plane and the window (2x1 meters, 4 meters
away).

>Although, I would sincerely request that Blender be removed from the
>table... sure it is hard to use, but far better than any other modeling
>program (cost: $0.00 and open source!).

Nothing personal has been put into the placement of the balls. It's
just that Blender's logo is virtually the same orange they use for the
1 ball, and that one should always be in the front. That's why Messiah
is in the far left corner, for example - their purple matches the 12
ball purple perfectly.

If I put something else in its place, I might offend someone else. I
am surprised Lance hasn't yelled already :)

>If for ethical reasons you can remove it, please move it to a less
>vulnerable place.

Blender has already moved to a less vulnerable place - in the public
domain, where all good software should be (need I point examples? :) )

>p.s. I now have some new wall paper.

Wow, that's by far the greatest compliment I've had. Thank you!


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message